Week Ending 5/30/2025

MARKET RECAP:

From May 26 to June 1, 2025, financial markets were shaped by a mix of economic data, corporate earnings, and policy developments, with significant volatility driven by U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff policies and related legal battles. Here’s a concise recap based on available information:
  • U.S. Stock Market Performance: The S&P 500 posted its strongest monthly gain since November 2023, rising about 6.2% in May, while the Nasdaq surged 9.6%. Despite a volatile session on May 30, the S&P 500 ended nearly flat, reflecting mixed reactions to Trump’s tariff rhetoric. On May 27, U.S. stocks soared, with the Dow up 1.78%, S&P 500 up 2.05%, and Nasdaq up 2.47%, fueled by Trump’s decision to delay a 50% tariff on EU goods until July 9, boosting consumer confidence. However, markets faced uncertainty later in the week as Trump accused China of violating a tariff agreement, escalating trade tensions.
  • Tariff Developments: Trump’s tariff policies were a focal point. On May 27, a U.S. Court of International Trade ruling blocked most of Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs, citing overstepped authority, which initially lifted markets. However, on May 30, a federal appeals court reinstated most of these tariffs, creating uncertainty. Investors speculated on the “TACO” trade (Trump Always Chickens Out), expecting Trump might soften his stance, but concerns persisted about alternative import duty measures. A key date to watch is June 5, when plaintiffs in the tariff case must respond to the appeals court.
  • Corporate Earnings and Sector Impacts: Nvidia’s earnings on May 28 were a major driver, with revenue of $44.1 billion beating estimates but falling short on adjusted EPS due to a ban on H20 unit shipments to China. Nvidia’s stock rose 3% in extended trading, contributing to a 24% monthly gain. Gap Inc. shares dropped after forecasting a multimillion-dollar hit to 2025 operating income from tariffs, though it maintained its forecast. Broadcom saw strong demand for AI-related chips, projecting a 44% year-over-year AI revenue increase for Q2 2025. Chip designers like Cadence and Synopsys fell after reports of U.S. restrictions on software sales to Chinese firms.
  • Economic Indicators: Consumer confidence rebounded in May as trade tensions eased, though concerns about stagnating incomes persisted. U.S. markets showed resilience, with a 1.2% weekly gain and 12% annual increase, supported by expectations of 14% annual earnings growth. The CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) rose 1.9% to 19.31 on May 29, reflecting heightened uncertainty. Gold prices, volatile around $3,200 in mid-May, were seen as a hedge against instability, with potential for new highs if trade tensions worsened.
  • Global Markets: European markets reacted positively to the U.S. tariff block on May 27, with the Stoxx Europe 600 and other indices advancing. In Asia, Japan’s Nikkei 225 fell 1.22% on May 30 amid high inflation (3.6% core in April), while South Korea’s Kospi dropped 0.84%. Germany’s inflation hit 2.1% in May, slightly above estimates.
  • Other Developments: The Federal Reserve’s May minutes raised concerns about the U.S. losing its status as a global financial safe haven due to tariffs. Bond yields soared amid gaping budget deficits, adding to market jitters. Investors awaited key data releases in early June, including PMI Manufacturing, unemployment rates, and the Fed’s Beige Book.

(highlights above provided by Grok)

SCOREBOARD

Week Ending 5/23/2025

MARKET RECAP

  • US stocks fell by 2.58%, international stocks advanced by 0.69%, and bonds declined by 0.43%.
  • The 30-year bond yield broke 5%, closing at 5.04%. The 10-year is at 4.51%, that is up 28 basis points in May.
  • The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow projects 2.4% growth in Q2.
  • Trump turned the positive momentum of the previous week on its head on Monday when he threatened a 50% tariff on all EU goods. He doesn’t learn.Trump should be working towards zero percent tariffs on both sides.
  • The House passed the “Big Beautiful [budget] Bill,” which will add an estimated $3 trillion to the deficit, leading to an increase in yields. Need less new tax breaks have been added, such as no tax on tips (cost $125 billion over the decade), no tax on overtime ($62.5 billion), car-loan interest deduction ($57 billion), tax relief for seniors ($25 billion), increased state and local tax deduction cap, and others.
  • Trump is passing up very rare opportunity to actually help get our fiscal house in order. He controls both the Senate and the House, and they do whatever he says. He should have implemented real spending cuts, and small tax increases (like a percent or so).
  • Senator Ron Johnson plans to make a major effort to stop the bill.

SCOREBOARD

Week Ending 5/16/2025

MARKET RECAP

  • SPX +5.27%, Russell 2000 +4.46%, Nasdaq +7.15%.
  • SPX is now 3% off its record high.
  • Stocks have staged a dramatic recovery since the April 8th low. Trump has backed off the dramatic tariff increases over the last few weeks, but he is still insisting on tariffs of at least 10% (at least so far) at best for some nations and more for others. While not nearly as bad as it could be, it is still bad for the economy. And the damage to the American brand make take a long time to recover, if it even does.
  • The consensus is that Scott Bessent takes precedence over Peter Navarro. That is a good thing!
  • China and the US agreed to reduce tariffs. The US tariff rate on Chinese imports is now 30%, and China will charge the US 10%. The US rate includes a 20% penalty for fetanyl.
  • Walmart warned they would increase prices and Trump then laid into them. What does Trump expect? If he doesn’t want Walmart to increase prices then don’t set tariffs.Yes, tariffs lead to price increases!
  • Moody’s downgraded US debt.

 

SPX

Week Ending 04/17/2025

MARKET RECAP

  • US stocks were off by 1.14% in a shortened trading week due to Easter.
  • Trump’s haphazard trade policy was on full display. Last Friday, it was said that smartphones, computers, and other products would be exempt from tariffs. But over the weekend, some officials said that was wrong.
  • On Monday, Trump said was considering pausing some auto tariffs. Hasn’t he said that before?
  • On Wednesday, the administration announced new US restrictions on exports to China, resulting in a 3.1% loss for the Nasdaq and 2.2% for the S&P 500.
  • China told its airlines not to order planes from Boeing.
  • The US dollar continues to weaken, and the American brand continues to suffer. The amount of damage Trump is causing is enormous. He has this one crazy economist, Peter Navarro, who is just blind to the damage he is causing. The irony is that the big winner in all of this might be China, and maybe the rest of the world.
  • Look at the chart below, which shows the performance of the Vanguard All-World Index (x-USA) versus the Vanugard Total Stock Market Index (the US total market). You see the international stocks breaking their negative trend to the upside right when Trump started getting crazy about the tariffs (late January / early February).

SCOREBOARD

Week Ending 4/11/2025

MARKET RECAP

  • Stocks had a big rally. The SPX was up by 5.67%, and the NASDAQ by 7.29%.On Wednesday, stocks rallied by over 9% when Trump announced a 90-day pause on tariffs for just about everyone except China. However, the 10% tariff will stay in place.
  • Supposedly, about 75 countries have reached out to negotiate a deal. As we have written before, if we can get tariffs to zero, then that would be a long-term win, minus the short-term damage, which is not minimal.
  • But even with the pause, 145% tariffs with China and the 10% flat rate tariff (with some exceptions) is still a huge problem.
  • In a bad sign, the yield on the 10-year treasury shot up from 4.01% to 4.48%. When inflation expectations skyrocket, interest needs to increase to compensate. In addition, the US seems to be losing its allure as a safe-haven for investors.The yield on the 2-year went from 3.68% to 3.96%, and the thirty-year from 4.41% to 4.85%.

US STOCKS

SCOREBOARD

Week Ending 4/4/2025

MARKET RECAP

  • Trump is leading us to economic suicide – see our article on tariffs – https://envisionco.net/?p=5448.
  • US stocks -9.13%, Nasdaq -10.02%. It was the worst week since March of 2020.
  • Small caps (-25%) and the Nasdaq (-22%) are now in a bear market.
  • Stocks are now trading at 19x 2025 estimates, but the estimates will come down.
  • The VIX is at 45, a very high number historically.
  • The 2-year yield is down 57 basis points year-to-date, at 3.68%. The 10-year has declined by the same amount and is now at 4.01%.
  • In some good news, jobs increased by 228k in March, although that is a backward-looking number and was before all of the tariff craziness.
  • Recession odds are dramatically increasing; JPM has a 60% probability.
  • The only faint hope is that the courts rule that there is no “emergency” and Trump cannot just randomly increase tariffs, or that Congress pulls back the authority from Trump, or that this is indeed, just a negotiating ploy and the goal is to get everyone to zero percent tariff rates, but the damage will still be severe unless these policies are reversed very soon.

SPX

SCOREBOARD

Trump’s Dangerous Tariff Policy

Trump’s Tariff Policy: Playing with Fire

Trump is playing with fire, and the worst part is he doesn’t even realize it. He was re-elected mainly on the back of a few key issues: high inflation during the Biden era, the crisis of illegal immigration, controversies surrounding gender in sports, and other “woke” policies. Many voters hoped he would tackle these problems with strong, decisive leadership. And for the most part, he has delivered on some of these, although maybe not in the best way possible. What they didn’t vote for was a radical upheaval of the economic framework that has underpinned America’s rise as the most prosperous nation on Earth.

Instead, Trump is steering the country toward what can only be described as economic suicide, mainly through a reckless and unprecedented expansion of tariffs.

From Negotiating Tool to Blunt Force Weapon

When used strategically, tariffs can serve as a useful bargaining chip in trade negotiations. That was the hope: Trump would leverage tariffs to strike better trade deals and reduce barriers between the United States and its trading partners. But it turns out, it was all just hope.

Rather than aiming for “reciprocal” tariffs—where the U.S. matches other countries’ rates—Trump has embraced a punitive approach based on trade imbalances. This means countries with whom we run trade deficits are being hit with steep tariffs, regardless of their own tariff policies.

Take Israel, for example. It dropped its tariffs on U.S. goods to zero. Instead of rewarding that move with reciprocal free trade, the U.S. slapped Israel with a 17% tariff simply because of a trade imbalance. That’s not reciprocity—that’s retaliation. It is also really bad economics. It punishes countries doing the right thing and distorts the very idea of fair trade.

Targeting Allies, Undermining Stability

Vietnam was hit with a staggering 46% tariff, despite becoming a manufacturing alternative to China—ironically, encouraged by the Trump administration during his first term. Now, companies that followed that guidance face devastating costs, with little warning and no clear rationale.

This kind of volatility undermines the trust that makes the U.S. a reliable economic partner. One of the key advantages of investing in America has always been its predictability: rule of law, open markets, stable policies. But if each administration can unilaterally upend the trade system on a whim, what does that say about our credibility?

A Blow to Markets, and to American Exceptionalism

The equity markets have already responded harshly. Over $5 trillion in market value has been erased within the last few days, with businesses and investors now uncertain about the future of trade under Trump’s policies. This is not a temporary blip—if these tariffs persist, the impact on inflation, business confidence, and supply chains will be long-lasting and painful.

Like the “transitory” inflation we saw post-COVID, tariff-driven inflation will be just as sticky and maybe worse. The U.S. cannot simply replicate complex, highly optimized global supply chains overnight—or even over several years. The result will be higher prices for consumers, lower profits for businesses, and a less competitive American economy overall.

A Legal and Constitutional Crisis in the Making

Perhaps most alarming is how these tariffs are being enacted. Trump is invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977—a law meant for genuine national emergencies—to justify these sweeping economic changes. But there is no emergency, only a manufactured justification for a deeply flawed policy. This is taxation without representation: hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes imposed on Americans, without congressional approval or public debate.

Not only does this bypass the legislative process, but it also violates existing trade agreements—including some that Trump himself negotiated. It risks permanently damaging our trade relationships and giving countries like China an opening to deepen ties with nations that feel betrayed by the U.S.

What Comes Next?

Is there a single respected economist not affiliated with the Trump administration who supports this policy? It’s doubtful. The hope, among some observers, is that Trump is using this strategy as a high-stakes negotiation tactic—an attempt to force other countries to the table to drop their tariffs to zero. But even if that’s the plan, the collateral damage is immense.

If this continues unchecked, it could lead to serious consequences—not just economically, but politically. Voters will punish Republicans in upcoming elections, especially as inflation rises and job losses mount. The tariff policy, as it stands today, is deeply unpopular, economically reckless, and fundamentally un-American in its disregard for free trade and fair competition.

Was Trump Paying Attention in 8th Grade?

Wasn’t the lesson of the 1930s that the Great Depression was made much worse because of the Smoot-Hawley tariffs? Didn’t everyone learn this in eighth grade? This is from the Senate’s own website (https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Senate_Passes_Smoot_Hawley_Tariff.htm):

A memorable scene from the movie Ferris Bueller’s Day Off has a high school teacher vainly struggling to get some response from his dazed students. He says: “In 1930, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, in an effort to alleviate the effects of the… Anyone? Anyone?… the Great Depression, passed the… Anyone? Anyone? The tariff bill? The Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act. Which, anyone? Raised or lowered?… raised tariffs, in an effort to collect more revenue for the federal government. Did it work? Anyone?… Anyone know the effects? It did not work, and the United States sank deeper into the Great Depression.” This amusing scene managed to omit the U.S. Senate, but it was on June 13, 1930, that the Senate passed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, among the most catastrophic acts in congressional history.

How did this happen? After Herbert Hoover became president in 1929, he called Congress into special session to deal with a troubled farm economy that had fallen into depression during the otherwise prosperous 1920s. President Hoover proposed a “limited revision” of the tariff on agricultural imports to raise rates and boost sagging farm prices. He then made the tactical error of trying to distance himself from the tariff debates. Republican protectionists, who controlled the House Ways and Means Committee chaired by Representative Willis Hawley, put the farm issue aside and took the opportunity to raise industrial tariffs to new highs. Hoover’s failure to object encouraged other economic interests to lobby the Senate Finance Committee, chaired by Utah senator Reed Smoot, for further tariff hikes. In protest, low-tariff Democrats and progressive Republicans slowed the tariff debate over a tedious 15-month process of congressional bargaining.

A thousand economists signed a petition, drafted by a Chicago economist, and future U.S. senator, Paul Douglas, that implored the president to veto the tariff. “Poor Hoover wanted to take our advice,” Paul Douglas mused, but he could not bring himself to break with his own party’s congressional leadership. Ignoring the experts, Hoover signed the tariff on June 17, 1930.

As the economists predicted, the high tariff proved to be a disaster. Even before its enactment, U.S. trading partners began retaliating by raising their tariff rates, which froze international trade. The tariff fight solidified Hoover’s ties with Republican regulars, but it shredded his standing among his party’s progressives. Most of the progressive Republican senators who had campaigned for Hoover in 1928 wound up endorsing Franklin D. Roosevelt for president in the next election. Nor did the tariff sit well with the voters. In 1932 they turned the majority in both houses over to the Democrats, by large margins. The voters also made clear their disdain for the Smoot-Hawley tariff by booting Jboth Reed Smoot and Willis Hawley out of office that year.

This is what Lawrence Summers said today

“This is a moment of testing for Trump’s advisors. The intellectually honest ones know that this reflects the President’s 40-year fixation, not any kind of a proven economic theory. This is the economic equivalent of what creationism is to biology or what ending vaccines is to medicine. The question is whether his advisors are going to have the courage to tell him and the courage to step away from being part of these policies, if he’s not willing to readjust.” (https://x.com/ThisWeekABC).

Final Thoughts

The U.S. should be leading the world toward freer markets and stronger global partnerships, not retreating into protectionism and economic isolation. The goal should be simple and clear: reduce tariffs to zero and let open markets determine the winners. That’s the best path to prosperity—for America and the world.

If Congress or the courts do not act soon to rein in Trump’s authority on trade, the consequences could be devastating—for the economy, our international relationships, and the long-term credibility of the United States on the world stage.